USPTO serial 76561410
BALANCED BRAKE UPGRADES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2950614Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BALANCED BRAKE UPGRADES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald J. Sokol
Ronald J. Sokol Sokol Professional Law Corporation1334 Park View Avenue, Suite 100Manhattan Beach, CA 90266UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Brake calipers, brake rotors, brake lines and brake pads sold as a kit for use in land vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 23, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |