USPTO serial 76561416
VALUE LABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VALUE LABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold W. Reick
HAROLD W REICK PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTONPO BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Acid reducers, analgesics, antacids, anti-diarrheals, anti-gas preparations, antihistamines, cold and allergy relief medications, cough suppressants, diet pills/tablets, dietary supplements, expectorants, fungicidal agents in the form of suppositories and creams, gastrointestinal treatment preparations, hair re-growth treatments, hemorrhoid treatment preparations, laxatives, migraine treatment preparations, nutritional drinks, nasal spray preparations, nasal decongestants, nutritional supplements, ovulation test kits, pain reliever and fever reducer medications, pregnancy test kits for home use, sleep aid pills/tablets, and smoking cessation aids | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |