Drawing for NOUVEAU CUISINE

USPTO serial 76561688

NOUVEAU CUISINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOUVEAU CUISINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew P. Lynch

MATTHEW P LYNCH28720 ROADSIDE DR STE 225AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301-4571UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ELECTRIC BLENDERS, ELECTRIC FOOD PROCESSORS, ELECTRIC STAND MIXERS, ELECTRIC HAND MIXERS, ELECTRIC FOOD CHOPPERS, ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS, ELECTRIC JUICERS, ELECTRIC JUICE EXTRACTORS, ELECTRIC COFFEE GRINDERS, ELECTRIC KNIFE SHARPENERS/CAN OPENERSACTIVE—
011ELECTRIC TOASTERS, ELECTRIC TOASTER OVENS, ELECTRIC CONVECTION OVENS, ELECTRIC ROTISSERIES, ELECTRIC GRILLS, ELECTRIC SKILLETS, ELECTRIC SLOW COOKERS, ELECTRIC BARBECUES, ELECTRIC DEEP FRYERS, ELECTRIC WAFFLE IRONS, ELECTRIC RICE COOKERS, ELECTRIC GRIDDLES, ELECTRIC COFFEE MAKERS, ELECTRIC COFFEE SERVING URNS, ELECTRIC EGG MAKERS, ELECTRIC POPCORN POPPERS, ELECTRIC SANDWICH MAKERS; ELECTRIC BREAD MAKING MACHINESACTIVE—
021COOKING POTS, MIXING BOWLS, FRYING PANS, STRAINERS, BAKING PANS AND BAKING SHEETS,ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance