Drawing for ELLAGADENE

USPTO serial 76561714

ELLAGADENE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELLAGADENE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Flynt

RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001BOTANICAL ESSENCES AND EXTRACTS FOR USE IN COSMETICSACTIVE—
005BOTANICAL ESSENCES AND EXTRACTS FOR USE AS DIETARY SUPPLEMENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 22, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance