USPTO serial 76561841
ARIZONA STING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARIZONA STING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOT L. CLAUS
SCOT L. CLAUS LAW OFFICES MARISCAL, WEEKS, MCINTYRE2901 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE SUITE 200PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2705UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment, namely, providing live lacrosse games, exhibitions and competitions; entertainment, namely, lacrosse games, exhibitions and competitions and programs relating to lacrosse provided through broadcast media, including television, radio, by computer via the Internet and private computer networks; providing information in the field of lacrosse; providing multi-user interactive computer games all via a global computer network and private computer networks; education services in the nature of lacrosse skills instruction; entertainment services, namely, sports fan club services, information and events for fan club members; and organizing and administering community based lacrosse programs and competitions for youths and adults | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |