Drawing for ARIZONA STING

USPTO serial 76561843

ARIZONA STING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARIZONA STING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scot L. Claus

SCOT L CLAUS LAW OFFICES MARISCAL, WEEKS, MCINTYRE2901 N CENTRA AVESTE 200PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2705

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely shirts, t-shirts, shorts, lacrosse uniforms, jerseys, sweatshirts, boxer shorts, robes, sleepwear and socks; and autographed shirts, t-shirts, shorts, lacrosse uniforms, jerseys, sweatshirts, boxer shorts, robes, sleepwear and socks, coats, jackets, pullovers, sweaters, pants, sweat pants and tops, caps, visors, shoes, athletic shoes, tank tops, scarves, stocking caps, gloves, vests, pajamas, underwear, rainwear, ponchos, belts and Halloween costumesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 14, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 14, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 3, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 13, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 12, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 31, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 21, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 21, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 23, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 23, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 23, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 25, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 25, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance