USPTO serial 76562049
TREINTAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TREINTAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY M. KEATS
ANTHONY M KEATS KEATS MCFARLAND & WILSON LLP9720 WILSHIRE BLVDPENTHOUSE STEBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobile parts, namely, car wheel rims | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |