Drawing for SCREAMATORIUM

USPTO serial 76562052

SCREAMATORIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCREAMATORIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michele P. Schwartz

MICHELE P SCHWARTZ ANDREWS KURTH LLP1717 MAIN ST STE 3700DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio and video cassettes, compact discs, video discs, records and CD-ROMs, all featuring motion picture and television programs; series of pre-recorded video cassettes and DVDs featuring motion picture films and television programsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, a continuing variety television program broadcast via an Internet web cast, and an on-going variety television program.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 29, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 29, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 20, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 13, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 13, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 12, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance