USPTO serial 76562232
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dara L. Onofrio
Dara L. Onofrio ONOFRIO LAW24 West Main Street - Suite 329Clinton, CT 06413UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | KITS FOR MAKING FURNITURE COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF UNFINISHED OR FINISHED WOOD; METAL COMPOSITIES OR METAL PIECES; FOAM, PLASTIC, FABRIC OR SELF STICK VENEERS, NAMELY KITS FOR MAKING TABLES, KITS FOR MAKING TABLE TOPS AND KITS FOR MAKING BOOKSHELVES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |