USPTO serial 76562522
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Mens Dress Pants; Mens Blue Jean Pants; Womens Dress Slack Pants; Womens Blue Jean Pants; Mens Dress Suit Jackets; Womens Dress Suit Jackets; Mens Dress Shirts; Mens T-shirts; Womens Dress Shirt Blouse; Womens Halter Top Shirts; Mens Leather Belts; Women and Mens Leather Jackets; Womens Leather Belts; Women and Mens Leather Coats; Women and Mens Head Bands; Women and Mens Sport Wear Shirts; Women and Mens Dress Shoe Leather; Women and Mens Sports Wear Tennis and Basketball Shoe; Women and Mens Universal Style Hats, (Baseball); Mens and Womens Underwear/Boxers; Mens and Womens Underwear Briefs; Womens Underwear Bra's Lingerie; Womens Underwear Casual Lingerie; Men and Womens Cotton Socks; Men and Womens Dress Socks, (Nylon); Mens and Womens Casual Dress Jackets; Clothing Labeling | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |