USPTO serial 76562532
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ACCESSMEDICAL PROVIDER NETWORK, INC.
PLEASANTON, CA
Other trademarks owned by ACCESSMEDICAL PROVIDER NETWORK, INC.
ACCESSMEDICAL PROVIDER NETWORK, INC.
PLEASANTON, CA
Other trademarks owned by ACCESSMEDICAL PROVIDER NETWORK, INC.
ACCESSMEDICAL PROVIDER NETWORK, INC.
PLEASANTON, CA
Other trademarks owned by ACCESSMEDICAL PROVIDER NETWORK, INC.
Dublin, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN G O'NEILL
SUSAN G O'NEILL ESQ HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY, LL425 MARKET ST 26TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Administration of a discount program for enabling participants to obtain discounts on health care and medical goods and services through participating providers through use of a discount membership card | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 13, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |