USPTO serial 76562557
DRIFT BATTLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRIFT BATTLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toyonaka, Osaka, 561-0842, JP
Toyonaka, Osaka, 561-0842, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaushal R. Odedra
KAUSHAL R ODEDRA WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Goggles for automobile racing; helmets for automobile racing; sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automobiles and parts and fittings therefor, namely, clutches; arms for automobiles, namely, suspension upper arms, suspension lower arms, stabilizer, trailing arms, axles, radius-rods, lateral-rods, tension rods and knuckle arms; damper system for automobiles, namely, straight and taper type springs, cylinders, pillow upper mounts and helper coil springs; suspension parts for automobiles, namely, coil springs, leaf springs and suspension rubbers; torsion bars for automobiles; shock absorber for automobiles; brake pads for automobiles; strut tower bars for automobiles; LSD, namely limited slip differential for automobiles; bushes for automobiles, namely, rubber bushes, polyurethane bushes, muffler bushes; non-electric motors and their parts for land vehicles, namely, internal combustion engines, jet engines and turbines | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Banners of paper, flags of paper; cardboard; stationery and study guides, photographs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Bandannas; belts; blouson; boots for sports; cap peaks; clothing of imitation leather, namely blouson and gloves; clothing of leather, namely, blouson and gloves; coveralls; footwear; gloves for automobile racing; gloves for driving vehicle; gloves; head gear, namely hats and caps; headbands; hoods; jackets; jerseys; jumpers; knitwear, namely sweater, headwear and socks; motorist's clothing, namely, racing suits and racing gloves; neckerchiefs; neckties; parkas; racing pants; racing suits; shirt fronts; shoes and boots for automobile racing; slippers; sports jerseys; sports shoes; stockings; suits; sun visors; sweat shirt and sweat pants; sweaters; tee-shirts; uniforms; vests; visors; waistcoats; work wear, namely, overalls and mechanic gloves | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, automotive drifting and racing events | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design for others; computer programming for others; maintenance of computer software; technology consultation, namely, introduction and explanation of performance and operation in the field of computers and automobiles; computer rental; design, programming and maintenance of software for the arcade and consumer video game machines of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by T.M.C. Company, Limited
- Other trademarks owned by T.M.C. Company, Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DRIFT BATTLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |