USPTO serial 76562575
ONESTEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONESTEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Barker
DAVID J BARKER BARKER LAW OFFICES12588 SANDSTONE RUNCARMEL, IN 46033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software that involves Software that involves a client based application that runs on WIN32 operating system; It is an interactive version of "AutoStore" (a software based program that is also owned by the Applicant); While AutoStore as a server based application collects documents from sources, OneStep will do so from connected devices and sources due to an interaction with the user that is logged on to the PC, thus having interactive capture, processing and routing abilities; Much like AutoStore, an administrator will setup a workflow using the OneStep Wizard, which supports the same framework as AutoStore as listed below-- Source-a device or a location where a document is either picked up or received from; Filter- a component that filters through the document that is picked up from the source such Filters are of various types, some are content extractors such as OCR, ICR and others are content processors such as security, image cleanup and management; Destination- Destinations are popular document and content management systems where the document is forwarded after it has been picked up from the source and processed by the filter; Once a workflow is designed, it is then saved and presented to the end user's desktop as a single button on the WIN 32 Bar; A user interaction is required to start the workflow by clicking on the selected button; Once executed, documents are collected from the source, processed and routed to the destination | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |