Drawing for DENTAL-EVAC

USPTO serial 76562723

DENTAL-EVAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DENTAL-EVAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER, PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Portable dental suction pump activated by handACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2006LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 23, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 10, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 9, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 12, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 1, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 3, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance