USPTO serial 76563047
EXCALIBLADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXCALIBLADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KNOWLEDGE & MERCHANDISING INC., LIMITED
Chesham, Buckinghamshire HP5 2PX, GB
Other trademarks owned by KNOWLEDGE & MERCHANDISING INC., LIMITED
KNOWLEDGE & MERCHANDISING INC., LIMITED
Chesham, Buckinghamshire HP5 2PX, GB
Other trademarks owned by KNOWLEDGE & MERCHANDISING INC., LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta S. Bren
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutting and edged tools and implements, all being hand operated, namely, razors; safety razors; dry shavers; blades for razors; razor blade dispensers; cases for razors and for dry shavers; scissors; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KNOWLEDGE & MERCHANDISING INC., LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by KNOWLEDGE & MERCHANDISING INC., LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named EXCALIBLADE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |