USPTO serial 76563100
ZOI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZOI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shartlesville, PA
Shartlesville, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
27Arthur R. Eglington
ARTHUR R EGLINGTON LAW FIRM OF ARTHUR R EGLINGTON601 Stoney Run Road RD#5POTTSVILLE, PA 17901-8727UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS FOR THERAPEUTIC USE, NAMELY, SKIN CLEANSERS, SUN BLOCKS, SUNSCREENS, AND COSMETICS, ALL FOR USE IN THE NATURE OF TREATING AGING AND SUN-DAMAGED SKIN AND FOR USE IN DERMAL REJUVENATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2008 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |