USPTO serial 76563239
BIG DADDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 2006
- Examiner
- HINES, REGINA C
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIG DADDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Laval, Quebec, CA
Laval, Quebec, CA
Laval, Quebec, CA
BISCUITS RONDEAU LIMITEE / RONDEAU COOKIES LIMITED
SAINT-LEONARD, CA
Other trademarks owned by BISCUITS RONDEAU LIMITEE / RONDEAU COOKIES LIMITED
SAPUTO BOULANGERIE INC. / SAPUTO BAKERY INC.
STLEONARD, CA
Other trademarks owned by SAPUTO BOULANGERIE INC. / SAPUTO BAKERY INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMON LEMAY
SIMON LEMAY LAVERY DE BILLY925 W GRANDE ALLEE STE 500QUEBEC CITY, QC G1S 1C1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COOKIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Biscuits Rondeau Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Biscuits Rondeau Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Biscuits Rondeau Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BISCUITS RONDEAU LIMITEE / RONDEAU COOKIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SAPUTO BOULANGERIE INC. / SAPUTO BAKERY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BIG DADDY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |