USPTO serial 76563405
TRILOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2007
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRILOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Healthcare Systems Management, Inc.
West Orange, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Healthcare Systems Management, Inc.
Healthcare Systems Management, Inc.
West Orange, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Healthcare Systems Management, Inc.
Healthcare Systems Management, Inc.
West Orange, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Healthcare Systems Management, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN F. ROTH
STEPHEN F ROTH LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ ET AL600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely software used for the identification and tracking of surgical instruments and for the education of the user on surgical instruments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 24, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Healthcare Systems Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Healthcare Systems Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Healthcare Systems Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TRILOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |