USPTO serial 76563648
ENZYTE, THE ONCE-A-DAY TABLET FOR NATURAL MALE ENHANCEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENZYTE, THE ONCE-A-DAY TABLET FOR NATURAL MALE ENHANCEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cincinnati, OH
Cincinnati, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Dinerman
MICHAEL A MERRERO ULMER & BERNE LLP600 VINE ST STE 2800CINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbal dietary supplements | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |