USPTO serial 76563679
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | TELEPHONE OPERATOR SERVICES, NAMELY, 24-HOUR EMERGENCY MEDICAL RESPONSE COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND THEIR HOSPITALS, HMO, HOSPICE CARE FACILITY OR HOME HEALTHCARE AGENCY VIA TELEPHONE TO ENSURE PATIENTS RECEIVE IMMEDIATE AND APPROPRIATE MEDICAL CARE | ACTIVE | Oct 27, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 26, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |