Drawing for HELPLINK

USPTO serial 76563679

HELPLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HELPLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035TELEPHONE OPERATOR SERVICES, NAMELY, 24-HOUR EMERGENCY MEDICAL RESPONSE COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND THEIR HOSPITALS, HMO, HOSPICE CARE FACILITY OR HOME HEALTHCARE AGENCY VIA TELEPHONE TO ENSURE PATIENTS RECEIVE IMMEDIATE AND APPROPRIATE MEDICAL CAREACTIVEOct 27, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 21, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 16, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 2, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 2, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 20, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 11, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 11, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 27, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 27, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 9, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 5, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 26, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 26, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance