CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TORNADOVAC

USPTO serial 76563769

TORNADOVAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TORNADOVAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Piontek

Michael Piontek Pyle & Piontek,LLC845 SHERWOODLA GRANGE PARK, IL 60526UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing commercial and industrial customers and end users with information, namely, on exhibitions of others and articles of others about floor care and floor care products by means of the Internet for assistance in selecting the appropriate floor care and floor care products for the commercial and industrial customers facilities and/or specific applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 18, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 22, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 8, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance