Drawing for TRUE BLUE FARMS

USPTO serial 76564036

TRUE BLUE FARMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOE, KELLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUE BLUE FARMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott W. Petersen

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Blueberries and blueberry products namely, syrups, concentrates, jellies, preserves, stewed and dried blueberriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 28, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 29, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 29, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 25, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 15, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 15, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 23, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance