Drawing for MAMMA LUCIA

USPTO serial 76564139

MAMMA LUCIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAMMA LUCIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ira C. Edell

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant, Catering and Carry Out Services Featuring Prepared and Ready To Eat Italian Cuisine; and Bar ServicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 13, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 13, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 30, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 4, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 1, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 13, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 10, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 2, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 29, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance