Drawing for RINKER - SNIDER & ASSOCIATES

USPTO serial 76564244

RINKER - SNIDER & ASSOCIATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RINKER - SNIDER & ASSOCIATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin T. Oliveira

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042ENGINEERING SERVICES, NAMELY, CIVIL ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING, TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING, AND PREPARATION OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS; ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION, HISTORIC PRESERVATION, MASTER PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT; RAPID RESPONSE ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES; DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, RECOVERY, AND MITIGATION SERVICES; HAZARD VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS; LAND AND FIELD SURVEYING; UTILITY DESIGN; TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES DESIGN; PLANNING AND PREPARATION OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS; LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUTS, UTILITY STAKEOUTS, GEOSPATIAL AND MAPPING SERVICES, NAMELY, BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY SERVICES, COMPUTERIZED MAPPING OF LAND, FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, GEOGRAPHIC DATA CONVERSION, AND FIELD INVENTORY SERVICES USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS; EXPERT WITNESS SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONDEMNATION SUPPORT; DAMAGE ASSESSMENTS; FORENSIC ENGINEERING NAMELY INVESTIGATION, TRIAL EXHIBITS AND LITIGATION SUPPORTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance