Drawing for CHK

USPTO serial 76564267

CHK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - REVIEW AND AMENDMENT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert D. Katz

Robert D. Katz Cooper & Dunham LLP30 Rockefeller Plaza 20th FloorNew York, NY 10112-0015UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
ACertifying the kosher quality of food, food products and beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 30, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 27, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2005CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Feb 18, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2005CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2004LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION—
Jul 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance