USPTO serial 76564424
POST OFFICE IN HEAVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POST OFFICE IN HEAVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gyeonggi-Do, 467-040, KR
Gyeonggi-Do, 467-040, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bassam N. Ibrahim
BASSAM N IBRAHIM BURNS DOANE SWECKER & MATHIS LLPPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22312-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | COFFINS; FUNERARY URNS; COFFIN FITTINGS; BIERS AND PLASTIC MORTUARY TABLETS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |