Drawing for MI BETTERBILT

USPTO serial 76564575

MI BETTERBILT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MI BETTERBILT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Benasutti

Frank J. Benasutti FRANK J BENASUTTI, BENASUTTI PC17294 BERMUDA VILLAGE DRBOCA RATON, FL 33487UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal windows and screen products, namely, double hung windows, single hung windows, slider windows, awning windows, basement windows, bay and bow windows, casement windows; aluminum windows; metal doors and screen products, namely, patio doors,storm doors and screen doorsACTIVE—
019Non-metal windows and screen products, namely, double hung windows, single hung windows, slider windows, awning windows, basement windows, bay and bow windows, casement windows; vinyl windows, screen windows and storm windows; non-metal doors and screen products, namely, patio doors, storm doors and screen doorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 11, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 31, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 31, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 30, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance