USPTO serial 76564582
HARMONY BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARMONY BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hamilton, Ontario, CA
Hamilton, Ontario, CA
HAMILTON, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal shower curtain rings, bathroom hampers, decorative cushions, chair pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Napkin rings not of precious mental, candle holders not of precious metal, porcelain dinnerware, stoneware, namely dishes, cups and bowls; Beverage glassware, flower containers, plastic and metal cooking utensils, namely, cooking pots, casseroles; plastic tumbler, toothbrush holder, soap dishes, soap dispenser, plastic coasters, ironing board pads and covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Clothes pin bags, net bags for storing sweaters, shoe bags for storage, garment bags for storage, under the bed storage bags for storing valuables | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Fabric table cloths, fabric runners, fabric napkins, fabric place mats, chair slip covers, oven mitts, pot holders, terry kitchen towels, linen kitchen towels, bath towels, face clothes, bar stool covers, tea cozies, curtain, BBQ mitts, slip covers, bed sheets, pillow cases, comforters, duvet covers, dust ruffles, pillow shams, vinyl place mats, vinyl table cloths, shower curtains | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Kitchen rugs, bath mats, and area rugs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Elco Home Fashions Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Elco Home Fashions Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TESORO HOME FASHIONS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named HARMONY BY DESIGN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |