USPTO serial 76564583
ELEVATING ORAL CARE TO SMILE CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELEVATING ORAL CARE TO SMILE CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. JAY SPIEGEL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | oral care products, namely, tooth whiteners, toothpastes, toothbrushes, breath sprays, breath mints, dental floss, and lip gloss, marketed and sold in high end retail department stores as well as in spas, salons, apothecaries, resorts, doctors' offices, dentists' offices, and high end hotels | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | wholesale and retail sales of oral care products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |