USPTO serial 76564704
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Tilbury, Essex, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel B. Binstock
DANIEL B BINSTOCK FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photographic apparatus and instruments; cameras; digital cameras; lenses for cameras; flash apparatus for cameras; attachments for cameras; tripods; lens hoods; camera bags and cases; bags and cases adapted for carrying cameras, camera equipment and photographic apparatus and their accessories; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Camera bags and cases; bags and cases adapted for carrying cameras, camera equipment and photographic apparatus and their accessories; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |