USPTO serial 76564870
PORCELANATO CERAMICS TO LAST A LIFE TIME PORCELANITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PORCELANATO CERAMICS TO LAST A LIFE TIME PORCELANITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arlington, TX
Arlington, TX
DISTRICT ("DELEGACION") MIGUEL HIDALGO, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dickerson M. Downing
Dickerson M. Downing Crowell & Moring, LLP153 East 53rd Street, 31st FloorNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely ceramic tiles, bricks, concrete blocks, ceramic tiles for flooring and lining, ceramic tiles for tile floors and covering, ceramic shapes for use in refractory furnaces, ceramic roofing tiles; non-metallic transportable buildings and ceramic stucco tiles, marmorino in the nature of plaster combining portland cement and marble carbonate, petreous aggregate materials in the nature of portland cement and marble pieces for swimming pool finishes, and other constructions in the nature of aviaries not of metal, gazebos not primarily of metal, modular silos and non-metallic monuments of stone, concrete or marble | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PORCELANITE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PORCELANITE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PORCELANITE, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named PORCELANATO CERAMICS TO LAST A LIFE TIME PORCELANITE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2007 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |