Drawing for LAYANA

USPTO serial 76565016

LAYANA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAYANA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David E. Dougherty

DAVID E DOUGHERTY LOWE HAUPTMAN BERNER LLP1700 DIAGONAL RD STE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Tubes and pipes formed of metal; junctions of metal for pipes; metal pipe work; metal pipe muffs; metal hardware, namely, sleeves and metal tanks; molds, namely, foundry chill-molds; and metal poles for electric linesACTIVE
009Electric switches, electric plugs, electrical outlets, electrical connectors, resistors, fingerprint sensors for electronic identification, fingerprint reading scanners, door locks provided with fingerprint recognition activation, security digit cards, namely fingerprint identification sensor cardsACTIVE
021Cups, bowls, drinking glasses, dishes, plates, pots, bottles sold empty, glass flasks; pottery, namely, cups, dishes, saucers, sculptures, vases, bowls, flower pots, pitchers, salt and pepper shakers, candle holders, and containers for general household or kitchen useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 29, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance