USPTO serial 76565152
Serial No. 76565152
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76565152?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Voigt, Jr.
Robert A. Voigt, Jr. WINSTEAD P.C.P.O. Box 50784Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | FRAGRANCE AND BODY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATH GEL, BATH LOTION, BATH OILS, BODY EMULSIONS, BODY CREAM, BODY MASK CREAM, BODY MASK LOTION, BODY MASK POWDER, BODY MASKS, BODY MILKS, BODY OILS, BODY POWDER, BODY SCRUB, BODY SPRAYS, COSMETICS, EYE CREAM, EYE GEL, EYE MAKEUP, FACE CREAMS, FACIAL EMULSIONS, FACIAL MAKEUP, FACIAL MASKS, FACIAL SCRUBS, FRAGRANCES FOR PERSONAL USE AND ROOM FRAGRANCES, MAKEUP, MASSAGE OIL, PERFUME, PERFUME OILS, SKIN CLARIFIERS, SKIN CLEANERS, SKIN CLEANSING CREAM, SKIN CLEANSING LOTION, SKIN CONDITIONERS, SKIN CREAM, SKIN EMOLLIENTS, SKIN LOTION, SKIN MASKS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS AND SKIN MOISTURIZER MASKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 9, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |