USPTO serial 76565244
TRADITIONS BY PROCTORSILEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRADITIONS BY PROCTORSILEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher E. Gatewood
Christopher E. Gatewood Threshold Counsel, PC1905 Huguenot Road, Suite 200Richmond, VA 23235UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Food and beverage cooking and processing appliances, namely electric coffee grinders, electric juicers, electric blenders, electric food mixers, and electric hand blenders | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Toaster ovens, electric sandwich makers, electric kettles, electric hot pots, electric slow food cookers, electric oven broilers and electric waffle bakers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named TRADITIONS BY PROCTORSILEX
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |