USPTO serial 76565276
LUQI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUQI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sanwon-Gu Ansan City Kyungki-Do, KR
Sanwon-Gu Ansan City Kyungki-Do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffy H. Greger
JEFFREY H GREGER LOWE HAUPTMAN BERNER1700 DIAGONAL RD STE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty products, hair care preparations, cosmetics and skincare preparations, namely hair spray, hair lotions, hair waving preparations, hair gel, hair mousse, hair tonic, hair colorants, hair dyes, hair bleach formula, shampoos, color-removing preparations for hair, lipsticks, mascara, badian essence, eye shadow, cosmetic creams, nourishing eye cream, sunscreen cream, sunscreen lotions, sunscreen preparations, skin cleansing cream, cold cream, skin whitening creams, cosmetics, perfumes, skin cleansing preparations, eye liner, cosmetic preparations for skin care, lotions for cosmetic purposes, hand lotion, hair bleaching preparations and hair decolorants, cosmetic preparations for the bath; and bath soap | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |