Drawing for OPTIMUM COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 76565293

OPTIMUM COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OPTIMUM COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

Mark Harrison VenableP.O. Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Telephone answering services; inbound and outbound telephone call contact center services provided for others; providing telephone receptionist services for othersABANDONED—
038Providing unified communications services, namely the centralized retrieval and initiation of voice, e-mail and fax messages and providing communication routing services with contact integration via telephone or web based equipment, namely personal computers, wireless personal digital assistant, or web enabled telephone that allows the user to determine how calls, messages, data and graphics are routed; messaging services, namely electronic transmission of messages and data; text and numeric wireless digital messaging services; wireless paging services; IP telephony services; IP centrex services; telecommunications services, namely providing local and long-distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, cable and satellite transmissionsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 12, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 12, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 13, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 26, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 10, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 9, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 9, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance