USPTO serial 76565364
KOPERNIK BEER TRADYCYJNY POLSKI SMAK OLD POLISH RECIPE 1473 1543
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2009
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with KOPERNIK BEER TRADYCYJNY POLSKI SMAK OLD POLISH RECIPE 1473 1543?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrzej Malarz
111 Brittany CourtClifton, NJ 07013United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BROWAR AMBER - Andrzej PRZYBYLO
- Other trademarks owned by BROWAR AMBER - Andrzej PRZYBYLO
- Other trademarks owned by BROWAR AMBER - Andrzej PRZYBYLO
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named KOPERNIK BEER TRADYCYJNY POLSKI SMAK OLD POLISH RECIPE 1473 1543
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 30, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | GNPE | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |