Drawing for PATHWAY TO HOPE

USPTO serial 76565440

PATHWAY TO HOPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PATHWAY TO HOPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis R. Kasper

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper goods and printed matter, namely, books, pamphlets, newsletters and booklets relating to faith-based programs for people with disabilities or special needs; notebooksACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, operating programs for people with disabilities; religious training services, namely conducting faith-based programs to assist the disabled to share their faith with others; religious services, namely, conducting faith-based programs, including Bible study classes for people with disabilities and operating faith-based programs to provide to people with disabilities to hear the GospelACTIVEJun 25, 2003
045Religious services, namely, prayer and worship services for people with disabilitiesACTIVEJun 25, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 8, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 20, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 2, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 8, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 5, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 12, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 20041.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance