USPTO serial 76565521
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY J. RUAN
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Adhesives for cosmetic use, aftershave gel, after-sun lotion, age retardant gel, age spot reducing creams, all-purpose cleansers, antiwrinkle cream, baby hair conditioner, baby lotion, baby oil, baby powder, baby shampoo, bath foam, bath gel, bath lotion, bath milks, bath oil, bath powder, beauty masks, body cream, body mask lotion, body oil, cosmetic pads, eye gel, eye makeup, eye shadow, facial cleansers, facial cream, facial makeup, facial masks, false nails, fragrances for personal use, hair bleach, hair care preparations, hair color, hair color removers, hair conditioners, hair dye, hair gel, hair lotions, hair mousse, hair removing cream, hair shampoo, hair spray, hair waving lotion, hand cream, hand lotion, hand soaps, lip cream, lip liner, lipstick, medicated soaps, moisturizing milks, nail care preparations, nail cream, nail enamel, and nail glitter | ACTIVE | Nov 25, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |