USPTO serial 76565591
FIRSTECH LIGHTING CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3259031Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 3, 2007
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FIRSTECH LIGHTING CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. William Larson
H. WILLIAM LARSON LARSON & LARSON, PA11199 - 69TH ST. N.LARGO, FL 33773UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lamps; electric light bulbs *, namely emergency warning lamps, architectural spot lights, security lamps, aircraft lighting, laser lamps for cutting steel, obstruction tower lamps, operating room lamps for medical uses, photographic lamps used in modeling, airport runway lighting lamps, locomotive lamps, emergency warning lamps, not for use in automobiles * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 24, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMGLO KEMLITE LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMGLO KEMLITE LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMGLO KEMLITE LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named FIRSTECH LIGHTING CORPORATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |