USPTO serial 76565729
DIRECTBUY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIRECTBUY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vytas M. Rimas
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISTRIBUTORSHIPS IN THE FIELD OF AREA RUGS; RETAIL SERVICES BY DIRECT SOLICITATION BY SALES AGENTS IN THE FIELD OF AREA RUGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |