USPTO serial 76565799
DOCTAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3175797Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2006
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DOCTAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE-07806 Neustadt/Orla-Molbitz, DE
DE-07806 Neustadt/Orla-Molbitz, DE
DE-07806 Neustadt/Orla-Molbitz, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Friedrich Kueffner
Friedrich Kueffner Lucas & Mercanti LLP475 Park Avenue SouthNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL COMPONENTS MANUFACTURED FROM SEMI-FINISHED GLASS PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF PORTIONED OR PREFORMED GLASS PARTS, NAMELY, GRANULATE, GOB OR OPTICAL RODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | RAW GLASS FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, OPTICAL APPLICATIONS, AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS AND OPTOELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS; SEMI-FINISHED GLASS PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF PORTIONED OR PREFORMED GLASS PARTS, NAMELY, LENSES, PRISMATIC BODIES, GRANULATE, GOB OR OPTICAL RODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | CUSTOM MANUFACTURING SEMI-FINISHED GLASS PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF PORTIONED OR PRE-FORMED GLASS PARTS, NAMELY, LENSES, PRISMATIC BODIES, GRANULATE, GOB OR OPTICAL RODS; CUSTOM MANUFACTURING OPTICAL COMPONENTS MANUFACTURED FORM THESE SEMI-FINISHED GLASS PRODUCTS, NAMELY, LENSES, PRISMS, FREE-FORMED LENSES WHICH ALL HAVE BEEN GROUND BLANK-MOLDED | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING THE TECHNICAL DESIGN OF RAW GLASS FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; DESIGNING SEMI-FINISHED GLASS PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF PORTIONED OR PREFORMED GLASS PARTS, NAMELY, LENSES, PRISMATIC BODIES, GRANULATE, GOB OR OPTICAL RODS; DESIGNING OPTICAL COMPONENTS MANUFACTURED FROM THESE SEMI-FINISHED GLASS PRODUCTS, NAMELY, LENSES, PRISMS, FREE-FORM LENSES WHICH ALL HAVE BEEN GROUND OR BLANK-MOLDED | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Docter Optics GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Docter Optics GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Docter Optics GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DOCTAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |