USPTO serial 76565902
TSI TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TSI TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Crocker
DAVID P. CROCKER RUSSELL HOUSE158 PLEASANT AVENUEPORTLAND, ME 04103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for performing complex data analysis in the field of undersea research; augmented reality computer systems composed primarily of computer hardware and supporting operating software in the field of navigation and surveillance; miniature computer systems composed primarily of hardware and supporting computer operating software in the field of navigation and surveillance | ABANDONED | Mar 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |