USPTO serial 76566021
MAKING NETWORKS SAFER FOR EVERYONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAKING NETWORKS SAFER FOR EVERYONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert V. Racunas, Jr.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Monitoring computer systems of others for technical purposes and providing back-up programs and facilities; technical support, namely, monitoring network systems; providing temporary use of on-line nondownloadable software for monitoring and protecting computer systems; using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect security data; consultation, development, customization and installation of computer software for monitoring and protecting computer systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; monitoring security systems; protecting computer systems by monitoring security software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hall, Aron
- Other trademarks owned by Hall, Aron
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named MAKING NETWORKS SAFER FOR EVERYONE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |