Drawing for RESPONDFAST

USPTO serial 76566086

RESPONDFAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESPONDFAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

T. Daniel Christenbury

T DANIEL CHRISTENBURY IP DEPT OF PIPER RUDNICK LLP1650 MARKET ST STE 4900PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE USE IN INFORMATION COLLECTION, UPDATING, AND MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance