USPTO serial 76566305
LENNAR QUALITY. VALUE. INTEGRITY.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3346545Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2007
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LENNAR QUALITY. VALUE. INTEGRITY.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
Mission Viejo, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
Mission Viejo, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
Mission Viejo, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA SHEREEN ZAMALUDIN
LISA SHEREEN ZALALUDIN Slates Harwell, LLP1700 Pacific AvenueSuite 3800DALLAS, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Consultation in the fields of real estate management and real estate brokering; real estate management and real estate brokerage services of residential communities, undeveloped properties and individual residences; financial services, namely, mortgage lending services, real estate title insurance underwriting services, and insurance agency services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2004 |
| 037 | Real estate development and planning services, namely, developing, laying out and constructing residential communities and individual residences | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named LENNAR QUALITY. VALUE. INTEGRITY.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ASDF | ASSIGNMENT CHANGE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2004 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| May 17, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |