Drawing for Serial No. 76566333

USPTO serial 76566333

Serial No. 76566333

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 76566333?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dina M. Hayes

Dina M. Hayes Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro4600 181 West MadisonChicago, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007POWER TOOLS, NAMELY, CORDED POWER DRILLSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 25, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 25, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 25, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 10, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 5, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 4, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance