CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DUNNE VILLE BRAND

USPTO serial 76566770

DUNNE VILLE BRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2947434Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 10, 2005
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with DUNNE VILLE BRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wesley Van Camp

Wesley Van Camp Tanimura & Antle Fresh Foods, Inc.1 Harris RoadSalinas, CA 93908UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031fresh onions; raw onions; unprocessed onionsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Dec 7, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 11, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 8, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jun 5, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 10, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 15, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance