Drawing for KEY MARK

USPTO serial 76566783

KEY MARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KEY MARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL F. ZENDEL

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Detergents and solvent-based detergents for industrial use; degreasing agents not for household useACTIVE—
003Detergents for household and institutional use, namely, detergent soap, dish detergents, detergents for laundry use; liquid and solid soaps, namely, deodorant soap, toilet soap, skin soap, saddle soap, disinfectant soap; all purpose cleaning preparations; polishing preparations for household, industrial and institutional use; scouring liquids and powders for household, industrial and institutional use; general purpose abrasive liquids and powders for household and institutional use; preparations for laundry use, namely bleach, blueing, pre-soak, sizing, starch; detergents for medical use, degreasing preparations not used in manufacturing processesACTIVE—
005All-purpose disinfectants; disinfectants for hygienic and sanitary purposes; sanitizers for household, industrial, hospital and institutional useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 30, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance