CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ARISTOCRAT SYSTEM XPRESS

USPTO serial 76566845

ARISTOCRAT SYSTEM XPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3248778Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 5, 2007
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ARISTOCRAT SYSTEM XPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith D. Moore

Keith D. Moore Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.308 Mallory Station RoadFranklin, TN 37067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Gaming devices, namely, gaming machines and associated software therewith to enable the gaming machine to runSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jan 24, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 25, 2007DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION—
Mar 6, 2007PMSMPETITION TO DIRECTOR - DISMISSED—
Jan 22, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 26, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Dec 26, 2006PDCBPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 15, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance